| Understanding Aphorism 16 to 18 - Vital Force in Cure |
|
| Organon & Philosophy |
Vital Force in Cure
In our last two lectures, we discussed the role of Vital Force in health and disease. Today we will discuss aphorisms 16 to 18 and explore the role of Vital Force in cure. The 16th aphorism states:
Here Hahnemann reiterates that since our vital force is dynamic in nature, it can only be affected by the dynamic influence of the external inimical forces to cause disease. Similarly, this dynamic disturbance at the level of energy can only be corrected by the dynamic power, the energy, in our remedies. But how do our remedies affect the vital force? Hahnemann says that the energy in our remedies is picked up by the nerves which are present everywhere in our body. This means that the remedies just act as signals. They provide the body with some information to correct the disturbance and the actual work of restoration is done by the body itself. Now as far as I know, we still do not know what these ‘signals’ are and how they are carried by the nerves and how they affect the restoration of health. There has been some inconclusive research on water memory and some nuclear-magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies, but we are still a long way from understanding the full dynamics behind the action of homeopathic remedies. But I still find it amazing that Hahnemann actually understood that if his remedies are ‘energy’ then the only way they can work is through the nervous system. Whether his assumption will hold true or not, only time will tell. But till now, we have no better explanation for the modus operandi of homeopathic remedies. Now in the footnote to this aphorism, Hahnemann says that even serious diseases with advanced pathologies can be caused by the non-material {dynamic) causes. Today scientists have documented a whole range of diseases (like asthma, hypertension, hormonal imbalances, IBS, ulcerative colitis, Alzheimer’s etc) that are caused or affected by mental, emotional and environmental factors. Most of these are now labeled as psychosomatic. But Hahnemann did not speak only about psychosomatic diseases. To him, most diseases started at the dynamic plane. Now let us move on to the 17th aphorism in which Hahnemann states:
Here he describes what happens to the vital force and the disease process when the correct remedy is administered. In simple words, he says that the disease is caused by the alteration of the vital force. This alteration, leading to disease proper, manifests itself in the form of signs and symptoms that can be perceived by our senses. He says that when the signs and symptoms are removed under the action of a suitable homeopathic remedy, the vital force is also corrected and the health is thus restored. I have earlier told you that some of his detractors used to say that under the action of a homeopathic remedy, the symptoms may disappear but the disease remains. To such people he again says, whatever the disease is, whatever the internal derangement might be, the physician has to remove the totality of the signs and symptoms to remove the disease. The disease manifests in the form of abnormal signs and symptoms and if you correct these, there is no doubt that the deranged vital force and the health are restored. Otherwise the symptoms would not go. To such people he says that the sole aim of the physician is to restore the sick to health. He is not supposed to make declarations about the hidden dynamics of the disease that he hardly understands. He is not supposed to behave as if he has some supernatural powers and can see the internal dynamics of the disease process. In the footnote he says that the physician should not make predictions about the nature of disease or the time of death, because it is not possible to predict such things. Instead, he should focus on the signs and symptoms, the language of the sick body, and use these gifts of nature to help the sick. In the next aphorism he reiterates this even more strongly. In the 18th aphorism, he says:
So he is saying that nothing except the totality of symptoms can be discovered in disease, nothing can be discovered in our body by means of which it signals the need for aid. I have earlier said that today we can discover much more through our extended sensory tools (diagnostic tools). But his statement was true for his time. But to a certain extent the statement still holds true. After all, the signs and symptoms are still usually the first reason for contacting a physician. The diagnostic tolls only enhance our understanding of the disease process. They cannot reduce the value of the signs and symptoms. He again says that the sum total of all the alteration from health in a sick individual, should be our sole guide for selecting a remedy. So if we summarize these three aphorisms, we can say: Disease is caused by the dynamic derangement of the vital force and it can be removed only by the dynamic influence of our remedies. The disease process makes itself known through the externally manifested signs and symptoms. The physician has to use these signs and symptoms to select the suitable remedy. The removal of the totality of signs and symptoms means that the alteration in the vital force is corrected and that the health is restored. Understanding the process of cure through Thermodynamics In our last lecture we discussed that any physical, mental, emotional or telluric (atmospheric) stress can result in the disturbance of the equilibrium of our body’s thermodynamic system. When the system loses its equilibrium, it tries to increase its entropy, causing changes in normal physiology. Since we still do not know about the mechanism of action of homeopathic remedies, we can only assume that they somehow provide the body information to correct the thermodynamic disequilibrium. It can provide the information to plug the energy leak from the system. We can only assume this for now. But we do know that homeopathic remedies work and we do know that there is no material substance in them. So if it is energy, it can affect our thermodynamic system. We cannot explain the process yet, but what is understandable is that when a suitable remedy is given, it first corrects the underlying imbalance. Once the biological thermodynamic system is restored to its equilibrium, the body is able to revert to normal physiological processes. The pathological processes, which are results of and thrive on a higher entropy state, stop receiving the supportive environment and the body’s normal defense mechanism is able to deal with them effectively. So this is it for now. We have now completed our discussion on the role of vital force in health, disease and cure. I hope you have enjoyed this discourse. Do send me your feedback at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
. References
---------------------------------------- Dr. Manish Bhatia
|

Listen to Dr. Bhatia's audio lectures on Homeopathy and Organon of Medicine. This much appreciated series of audio lectures on Organon is considered a landmark in making Organon understandable to everyone - with easy language, relaxed pace, philosophical insights and scientific explanations. Learn more...

Wondering how to learn homeopathy? Enroll in Dr. B's free online homeopathy medicine course and learn about homeopathy remedies and homeopathic treatment. Join over 10,000 other students who have started their homeopathic journey with Dr. B's insights! Learn more...
I like what you say about the VF in cure and your way of explaining what Hahnemann was getting at. However there are a couple of points I’d like to comment on.
In your piece you mention that we are still a long way from understanding the full dynamics behind the action of homeopathic remedies and so it is fairly pointless to theorise about such things. I believe you are correct in that, but theorising is almost a hobby of mine and so what I am about to say should be taken as just my thoughts – I don’t have any evidence to support them but it’s interesting to explore these issues anyway.
I think we sometimes get sidetracked by this idea of remedy as energy medicine. My current thinking is that we should not attribute any energy qualities to the remedy. If the action of the remedy is due to it’s energy, I’d have thought the level of energy of a persons vital force will be several million times more than that in a remedy so a remedy’s energy would be swamped by that of a (deranged) vital force and therefore be ineffective. I’m thinking that it is not energy that causes a remedy to act but information - as you were hinting at in your points about symptoms as signals.
If we think about DNA a moment, this is actually just packets of genetic coding. Coding is information. In this case it is organic information but nevertheless the important thing is the information it holds, not the energy. Scientists can now take DNA from long dead animals or plants and grow cells from it. It is not the energy that grows the cells, the energy comes from elsewhere, the DNA is the coding that allows the growing thing to take a certain form.
Now consider a virus. Viruses are not alive in the way we commonly understand ‘life’, they are organic packets containing DNA/RNA that need the energy of the host to replicate – they live through the energetic processes of the host. They are in effect little packets of information which once engaged in a cell, cause the cell to become ‘diseased’. The cell is not diseased because of the energy of the virus but because of the information held in it.
This is similar to a computer virus. The thing that causes a computer to become dysfunctional is not an energetic body, it is a chunk of information. The response and cure to a computer virus is to give it some new programming i.e. information, rather than to give it something full of energy to somehow overcome the virus. Electric current is the vital force of the computer but it is information that decides whether it is performing (healthy) or not (diseased).
I think remedies are packets of information that the vital force is able to read. If someone is susceptible to a dis-ease or to a remedy it is because their vital force is able to take the information and deform or reform as a result of it. The energy is in the vital force not in the remedy.
This ties in to another confusion that I have, which is about the idea that the only way to remove the disease is through the removal of symptoms. As you put it - when the signs and symptoms are removed under the action of a suitable homeopathic remedy, the vital force is also corrected and the health is thus restored. I’m a little uncomfortable with the way this suggests that if you get rid of the symptoms you ALSO get rid of the disease. For me there is no way to get rid of the disease until you’ve corrected the vital force. The VF is the thing that produces or cures symptoms. It is the ‘symptom giver’ as one homeopath puts it. So you cant do anything about the symptoms, you can only affect the VF. The reason I mention this is because I see some people talking about curing symptoms or they may see some symptoms and suggest a certain remedy has dealt with those symptoms and another remedy is needed for the other symptoms – reinforcing the idea that remedies work on symptoms, which I think they don’t.
Anyway, those are just some thoughts which I thought I’d share for no reason whatsoever. As I said, generally I like your explanations and agree with what you say.